Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6489
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEdina Chandiwanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaston Sigaukeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlphonce Bereen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-12T06:49:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-12T06:49:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-12-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6489-
dc.description.abstractThe increasing demand for electricity and the need for clean energy sources have increased solar energy use. Accurate forecasts of solar energy are required for easy management of the grid. This paper compares the accuracy of two Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models combined with Additive Quantile Regression (AQR) and Bayesian Structural Time Series (BSTS) models in the 2-day ahead forecasting of global horizontal irradiance using data from the University of Pretoria from July 2020 to August 2021. Four methods were adopted for variable selection, Lasso, ElasticNet, Boruta, and GBR (Gradient Boosting Regression). The variables selected using GBR were used because they produced the lowest MAE (Minimum Absolute Errors) value. A comparison of seven models GPR (Gaussian Process Regression), Two-layer DGPR (Two-layer Deep Gaussian Process Regression), bstslong (Bayesian Structural Time Series long), AQRA (Additive Quantile Regression Averaging), QRNN(Quantile Regression Neural Network), PLAQR(Partial Linear additive Quantile Regression), and Opera(Online Prediction by ExpRt Aggregation) was made. The evaluation metrics used to select the best model were the MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and RMSE (Root Mean Square Error). Further evaluations were done using proper scoring rules and Murphy diagrams. The best individual model was found to be the GPR. The best forecast combination was AQRA ((AQR Averaging) based on MAE. However, based on RMSE, GPNN was the best forecast combination method. Companies such as Eskom could use the methods adopted in this study to control and manage the power grid. The results will promote economic development and sustainability of energy resourcesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCornell Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofarXiven_US
dc.subjectAdditive quantile regressionen_US
dc.subjectBayesian structural time seriesen_US
dc.subjectForecast combinationen_US
dc.subjectGaussian processesen_US
dc.subjectSolar irradianceen_US
dc.titleRobust modelling framework for short-term forecasting of global horizontal irradianceen_US
dc.typepreprinten_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05978 Focus to learn more-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa; Department of Applied Mathematics, Midlands State University, Private Bag 9055, Senga, Gweruen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africaen_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage25en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypepreprint-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_816b-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Robust modelling framework for short.pdfAbstract6.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Feb 26, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.